OK, so What Car? is reviewing the Peugeot E-3008, an altogether uninspiring SUV now available as an uninspiring all-electric SUV. What Car? claims that the E-3008 has a “HUGE range” and the YouTube thumbnail clearly states a 435-mile range. It’s pure clickbait and the presenter sneaks in the term “perhaps” it could do over 400 miles. At this point, my teeth are gnashing and I am ready to throw a boot at the TV screen.

The presenter prattles on about the interior… you know what?… I don’t care about the fu-ki-g boot space, I don’t care about the fu-ki-g infotainment system nor do I care about the fu-ki-g exterior colour. Are you going to tell me about the range? Does he confirm the fu-ki-g range? No, he fu-ki-g doesn’t.

And I know that the E-3008 will not be able to achieve anywhere near the clickbait range because Peugeot is as technologically advanced as a petrified tree stump. But I am just waiting for the presenter to confirm what I already know, and he doesn’t even fu-ki-g do that. No fu-ki-g real-world stats.

What Car? is viewed by consumers as a trusted automotive source, but after this advertisement, I now know why they use a question mark as part of their branding because I don’t know what they fu-ki-g stand for. I don’t care about the fu-ki-g headroom, I don’t care about the fu-ki-g knee room… for fucks sake, tell me the range.

Does he? no he fu-ki-g doesn’t. Do your job or don’t do it at all, don’t waste 15 minutes of my life… I don’t care about the fu-ki-g trim levels! The presenter just prattles off-range specifications from fu-ki-g Peugeot, he actually believes fu-ki-g press statements, for fucks sake! What a waste.

I may as well just think about nothing because thinking about nothing is more stimulating and informative than this fu-ki-g review.